Unfavorable social determinants of health and risk of mortality in adults with diabetes: findings from the National Health Interview Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the role of social determinants of health as predictors of mortality in adults with diabetes may help improve health outcomes in this high-risk population. Using population-based, nationally representative data, this study investigated the cumulative effect of unfavorable social determinants on all-cause mortality in adults with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey, linked to the National Death Index through 2019, for mortality ascertainment. A total of 47 individual social determinants of health were used to categorize participants in quartiles denoting increasing levels of social disadvantage. Poisson regression was used to report age-adjusted mortality rates across increasing social burden. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between cumulative social disadvantage and all-cause mortality in adults with diabetes, adjusting for traditional risk factors. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 182 445 adults, of whom 20 079 had diabetes. In the diabetes population, mortality rate increased from 1052.7 per 100 000 person-years in the first quartile (Q1) to 2073.1 in the fourth quartile (Q4). In multivariable models, individuals in Q4 experienced up to twofold higher mortality risk relative to those in Q1. This effect was observed similarly across gender and racial/ethnic subgroups, although with a relatively stronger association for non-Hispanic white participants compared with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative social disadvantage in individuals with diabetes is associated with over twofold higher risk of mortality, independent of established risk factors. Our findings call for action to screen for unfavorable social determinants and design novel interventions to mitigate the risk of mortality in this high-risk population.

Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Disease: Who Should be Tested?

Up to 25% of patients with thoracic aortic disease have an underlying Mendelian pathogenic variant. This is a heterogeneous group of disorders known as heritable thoracic aortic diseases (HTAD). Diagnosing associated pathogenic gene variants and syndromes is critical, as the underlying genetics have an implication in medical management, surveillance, thresholds for surgical intervention, surgical risk, pregnancy risk, and risk of inheritance by the offspring. Recently released 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aortic diseases provide specific recommendations to identify patients at risk for heritable conditions and who should undergo genetic testing.

Variable abnormality of the melanopsin-derived portion of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and parkinsonism features.

OBJECTIVES: Ascertain and quantify abnormality of the melanopsin-derived portion of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and parkinsonism features based on a statistical predictive modeling strategy for PLR classification. METHODS: Exploratory cohort analysis of pupillary kinetics in non-disease controls, PD subjects, and subjects with parkinsonism features using chromatic pupillometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve interpretation of pupillary changes consistent with abnormality of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) was employed using a thresholding algorithm to discriminate pupillary abnormality between study groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled, including 17 PD subjects (age range 64-85, mean 70.65) and nine controls (age range 48-95, mean 63.89). Two subjects were described as demonstrating parkinsonism symptoms due to presumed Lewy body dementia and motor system atrophy (MSA) respectively. On aggregate analysis, PD subjects demonstrated abnormal but variable pupillary dynamics suggestive of ipRGC abnormality. Subjects with parkinsonism features did not demonstrate pupillary changes consistent with ipRGC abnormality. There was no relationship between levodopa equivalent dosage or PD severity and ipRGC abnormality. The pupillary test sensitivity in predicting PD was 0.75 and likelihood ratio was 1.2. CONCLUSIONS: ipRGC deficit is demonstrated in PD subjects; however, the degree and constancy of abnormality appear variable.

Detection of Parkinson's Disease Through Automated Pupil Tracking of the Post-illumination Pupillary Response.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders, but it is often diagnosed after the majority of dopaminergic cells are already damaged. It is critical to develop biomarkers to identify the disease as early as possible for early intervention. PD patients appear to have an altered pupillary response consistent with an abnormality in photoreceptive retinal ganglion cells. Tracking the pupil size manually is a tedious process and offline automated systems can be prone to errors that may require intervention; for this reason in this work we describe a system for pupil size estimation with a user interface to allow rapid adjustment of parameters and extraction of pupil parameters of interest for the present study. We implemented a user-friendly system designed for clinicians to automate the process of tracking the pupil diameter to measure the post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR), permit manual corrections when needed, and continue automation after correction. Tracking was automated using a Kalman filter estimating the pupil center and diameter over time. The resulting system was tested on a PD classification task in which PD subjects are known to have similar responses for two wavelengths of light. The pupillary response is measured in the contralateral eye to two different light stimuli (470 and 610 nm) for 19 PD and 10 control subjects. The measured Net PIPR indicating different responsiveness to the wavelengths was 0.13 mm for PD subjects and 0.61 mm for control subjects, demonstrating a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). Net PIPR has the potential to be a biomarker for PD, suggesting further study to determine clinical validity.

Dosage considerations in the combined use of ocular-specific vitamins and nutrients and multivitamin products: A systemic review and analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To provide guidance for safe and appropriate vitamin and mineral supplementation regimens for patients who use vitamins marketed for ocular use concurrently with general-purpose multivitamin (MVI) supplementation. DATA SOURCES: Primary and tertiary evidence was compiled from secondary literature reference databases. STUDY SELECTION: Dosage exposure with the use of supplements marketed for the prevention of ocular disease, including those recommended by the Age-Related Eye Disease Studies (AREDS), when used in combination with conventional MVI/nutrient products was determined. An analysis of the data was performed to suggest appropriate supplement recommendations. DATA EXTRACTION: Combined dosages for single and duplicate ingredients found in ocular supplements and select MVI/nutrient supplements were compared with U.S. Food and Drug Administration--recommended daily value intake levels and the National Academy of Medicine recommendations on vitamin and nutrient tolerable upper intake levels (TUILs). RESULTS: With the exception of copper, all studied product components that conformed to AREDS guidelines for vitamin and nutrient levels far exceeded U.S. Food and Drug Administration--recommended daily value intake level limits. Furthermore, vitamin A and zinc exceeded the National Academies of Medicine TUIL when a multivitamin product was combined with an ocular-specific vitamin or nutrient that conformed with AREDS-recommended dosage levels. Several products marketed specifically for ocular use failed to provide AREDS-recommended vitamin or nutrient levels even when combined with MVI products. CONCLUSION: With the exception of vitamin A and zinc, the addition of typical multivitamin preparations to AREDS-recommended vitamin and nutrient regimens do not result in vitamin and mineral dosages that exceed TUIL as outlined by the National Academy of Medicine. However, combined AREDS and MVI regimens can create a substantial vitamin or mineral burden that is not appropriate for all older adult populations, particularly those with comorbidities, contributing to susceptibility of component toxicity.